|
|
Proposed Ballot 2007-06 Comments
| Jurisdiction/Company |
Position |
Comments |
| Alabama |
Support |
Support. An audit procedure addressing this issue has been needed for some time. This proposed procedure will help promote uniformity. |
| Washington |
Opposed |
Do not support the ballot. The audited distance for the unreported jurisdiction should be listed in the audited distance column as part of the audit findings. However, charging current year registration fees for a prior registration year oversight doesn’t make sense. Even if the carrier had reported actual miles in the reporting period for a jurisdiction, there is nothing to suggest that the registrant would want or intended to apportion in the registration year for that jurisdiction. |
| ATA |
Opposed |
This is so confusingly worded that it’s not easy to determine just what the remedy for this problem (if it is one) is supposed to be. The reference to §415 is not very helpful, nor the reference to “the unreported distance.” Opposed. |
| Oregon |
Opposed |
Do not support as written. The operations were found in the mileage reporting period, a previous registration year. How do we then assess the current registration year's fees for these operations? |
| Total supporting: |
1 |
|
| Total opposed: |
3 |
|
| Total undecided: |
0 |
|
|
|