|
|
Proposed Ballot 2007-07 Comments
| Jurisdiction/Company |
Position |
Comments |
| Alabama |
Support |
Support. Proposed language provides clear assessment procedures for failure to maintain required records. |
| Washington |
Opposed |
Do not support. “If an estimate of liability [based on whatever information the Registrant can supply] cannot be estimated,” the consequences of non-compliant records on a couple of points have already been taken into account. The ballot language is unnecessary. |
| ATA |
Opposed |
This is simply too broad and leaves too much to an auditor’s discretion. Besides, it’s unnecessary, since existing Plan language gives jurisdictions all the latitude they need in this area. Strongly opposed. |
| Oregon |
Opposed |
Do not support as written. Oregon does not think this language is necessary given existing language in the Plan. |
| Total supporting: |
1 |
|
| Total opposed: |
3 |
|
| Total undecided: |
0 |
|
|
|