|
|
Proposed Ballot 2007-09 Comments
| Jurisdiction/Company |
Position |
Comments |
| Alabama |
Opposed |
Oppose. Proposed language is unnecessary. |
| Washington |
Support |
Support the ballot as written. |
| ATA |
Opposed |
It looks like this proposal would add to the Plan only a statement that is in the nature of commentary to existing language, not a new or different requirement. It doesn’t appear to be necessary. Opposed. |
| Oregon |
Opposed |
Do not support. Oregon does not think this language is necessary. |
| Total supporting: |
1 |
|
| Total opposing: |
3 |
|
| Total undecided: |
0 |
|
|
|